Urban Ecology

Patti Moreno, Cheerleader for Sustainable Urban Living

Readers, meet Patti Moreno.  You can visit her site for videos about urban sustainable living, with titles like "How to Create a Sustainable Urban Garden" and "How to Have an Eco-Friendly Christmas" and lots more coming soon.  Okay, now heeeere's Patti!

Patti's big news recently is about being chosen as the new host of Farmer's Almanac TV, a 30-minute show on 90 percent of PBS stations nationwide (but sadly, not in DC or Baltimore).  Her episodes will start to appear next April (and maybe someday on their website?) but I already know that hiring Patti is a smart move by the folks at Farmer's Almanac because the name screams old-fashioned and everything about Patti is young and hip.  So she's just what they need, and a far better choice than the spokesmodel types favored by HGTV.  There's more about Patti on their site, though for the really interesting stuff about her, keep reading right here.

Patti_2 The road to stardom
Patti kindly submitted to a phone interview for this profile, probably assuming I wanted to talk about urban sustainability and any number of serious subjects.  Nope, I wanted to know how she got to be TV Garden Girl.  So I pried and learned that she left NYC to study broadcasting and film at Boston University, which led (somehow) to establishing FilmShack, a "mom and pop film production company," with her husband Robert Patton-Spruill.  Company offices are in the renovated former home of filmmaker Henry Hampton, which is right on the grounds of their Roxbury (downtown Boston) home.  How cool is that?

Oh, but it gets cooler.  One of their recent productions, Public Enemy: Welcome to the Terrordome, was previewed recently at the American Film Institute and won a rave review from Variety.  Googling their names unearthed more envy-inducing mentions than I really cared to read.

Next I honed in on the question: How did she get that gig with Farmer's Almanac?  Answer: She made a 5-minute demo tape, circulated it among her contacts, and the folks at Farmer's AlmanaPattigoatc stumbled upon it in their search for a new host.  (Not surprisingly, since that demo's now been viewed 58,000 times, but how the heck did that happen?  I bet only insiders know the answer to that one.) 

What she's passionate about
When I wasn't cross-examining Patti about her career she kept returning to what she really wanted to talk about - her apple orchard, her raised veggie beds, the joys of raising livestock (like the goat shown here), her heroes Elliot Coleman and Andy Lee (author of Chicken Tractor), and assuring me that she's NOT preaching eco-perfection.  Oh, and she's no fan of lawns and has a video coming out soon about replacing them with edible landscapes, which we'll be sure to post right here because it's one of my favorite topics, too.

Posted by Susan Harris

Should D.C.'s Public Rose Gardens Showcase Toxic Perfection?

Folger_rose_gardenLet's pay a visit to the Folger Rose Garden, the visual centerpiece at the front of the Smithsonian Institution's Arts and Industries Building.  I decided to check it out because a friend who works nearby had told me "It's sprayed so much, it glows at night." 

It's a Victorian-style garden comprised mainly of hybrid tea roses, which, particularly in this hot and humid climate, require the regular spraying of fungicides and pesticides to perform as required. After all, they're here to do a job - to enhance the aesthetics of this wonderful building using historically compatible plants and style.  But a mere 9 years after it was created, to my eyes the garden is already an anachronism because we've turned a corner (finally) in the U.S., and toxic landscaping practices are no longer acceptable.

Here's a terrific photo showing a larger view.

Rosegarden350 Next, I spoke with Shelley Gaskins, the horticultural curator in charge of making those gardens perform their job duties.  Very nice person. She confirmed the regular schedule of spraying for these roses, even the 'Knockouts' now included in the collection, and the reason for it: in such a high-traffic area, it's not acceptable to let the plants defoliate (lose their leaves and look crappy).

So of course I asked the obvious question: Has any thought been given at the Smithsonian to switching to plants that don't need such a toxic diet, like the new easy-care roses?  The answer: People don't have the same emotional reaction to shrub roses as they do to hybrid teas, which we associate with our grandmothers.  In other words, the Smithsonian believes or maybe even knows that this is what tourists want.  I have to say I think that's probably true, but should tourists get what they want in this case?  How about transitioning to a garden that would showcase a different kind of beauty, one that not only looks more natural, but IS more natural.  Not to mention toxin-free.

I didn't say all that, I just asked the final question:  What would it take to get the decision-makers to plant something different? Lobbying.  I should have guessed, this being Washington.

THE NATIONAL GARDEN'S TOXIN-FREE ROSES
Now just 3 blocks away is a very different kind of rose garden - an organic one.  It'sRosegarden2web a feature in the new National Garden, next door to the U.S. Botanic Garden.  Because most of the space is devoted to the sparse, ultra-native Regional Garden, which we hope will fill out and lose its sparseness in due time, the very formally-styled First Ladies Water Garden and  Rose Garden look a bit out of place here.  And the weird mix of styles probably reflects the various funding sources but hey, at least the roses don't get sprayed.  Margaret Atwell, the rosarian for this garden, tells me that unsuccessful plants ARE being ripped out.  That's the kind of tough love I give almost all of my plants. 

Both gardens - the National Garden's organic rose garden and the Smithsonian's stinky chemical garden - have plant labels, which is a good thing.  But if the chemically addicted roses are going to stay there, how about adding a sign telling the public the kind of care required for them to look so good?  At least educate.

GRANDMOTHER'S ROSES
Now can we please revisit the notion that our grandmothers grew hybrid teas?  I remember the Iowa garden of my own grandmother as a riotous mix of colorful plants that included roses of some kind, but what impressed me no end was the swarming mass of pollinators it attracted, especially hummingbirds. And the childhood memory that I DO have of hybrid tea roses is of a neighbor's large rose garden, which was always infested with Japanese beetles.  We kids loved grabbing them and dunking them in the many nearby insect traps. Helping to protect this man's plants from insects was a mission we totally bought into.  So, is that the kind of old-fashioned gardening we still want to teach?

Posted by Susan Harris. Credit for top photo. Others are mine.

More Urban Greening

From Treehugger, a Tale of 3 Cities:

  • Non-profit Buffalo ReUse takes apart some of the 10,000 abandoned houses in Buffalo, saving 4 million pounds from landfill each year.
  • As part of our ongoing 'Tell Us About Your City' series, we look at Sydney ranked as the world's most favourite city amongst the top 15 Green Cities.
  •  Chicago showed 'bare knuckle politics' with a decree that city vehicles would no longer use BP fuel cards if the company polluted Lake Michigan.

Yes, City Gardeners CAN Have Wildlife Habitat Gardens

Here's a terrific article in the Washington Post about a wildlife habitat garden in Adams Morgan, coincidentally gardened by my friend Iris Rothman.  I've spent time in this garden and believe me, it's an experience of being in nature. (Go, Iris!)

Posted by Susan Harris

Urban Greening News

Hot off the presses is an article in the San Francisco Chronicle about urban gardenwalks as engines for community revitalization - in Buffalo, Chicago and Seattle.  The story's by my GardenRant partner Amy Stewart, and I was there in Buffalo with her for their hugely successful GardenWalk Buffalo last month.   I think of it as people's gardening and can't help but wonder:  Is DC ready for its garden walk?

Here's another great story by Marty Hair in the Detroit Free Press, this one about the greening of yet another Rust Belt city.  Notice there are four agencies involved in making vacant lots available and helping residents grow produce and then sell it.  (Maybe it takes more than a village but a whole city to make it happen.)

"Beat" the heat and drought? Accommodate is more like it

Here's an excellent summary of drought-beating gardening practices by Joel Lerner for the Washington Post.

Posted by Susan Harris

Global Warming in the Garden

There’s been lots of news lately about the effects of climate change on  our gardens and oddly, it’sCrapemyrtle usually presented as good news to gardeners. They’re shown rejoicing over the warm-climate plants they can now grow, like crape myrtles in Upstate New York. BUT:

IT'S GLOBAL WEIRDING
Some plants are failing because the winter cooling period isn’t long enough. And others, like lilac, Eastern white pine, American arborvitae, Colorado blue spruce, and many junipers, suffer when summer evenings don’t cool down enough. Local garden writers are no longer recommending many of their old favorites for local gardens - like PJM rhododendrons and yews.

  • Rain events are more extreme, taking the form of longer droughts and more deluges. Not good for landscapes, for agriculture or for plants in our few remaining natural areas.
  • Longer warm periods mean more generations of some pests per year. Others, like the wooly adelgid that’s killing Canadian hemlocks throughout the East, are increasing their number because winters aren’t cold enough to keep them in check.
  • Weedy and noxious plants, like poison ivy, honeysuckle and kudzu, thrive in the presence of extra carbon dioxide, and poison ivy becomes more toxic than ever. Ragweed produces more pollen. Kudzu moves north. Some weeds, like Canadian thistle, are now resistant to herbicides.
  • Native plant populations are threatened by these changes in temperature, rainfall, pests and competitors, even the iconic ones chosen as state flowers and trees. In fact, the National Wildlife Federation predicts that 28 states will see their official plants become extinct by the end of the century. Picture Ohio without its buckeye or Kansas without its sunflower. Climate change has become a major threat to plant conservation, along with development and invasive species.
  • The East experienced a Miami-style January this year, followed by a frigid February. These alternating balmy+frigid periods take their toll on blossoms and whole plants. Fruit growers were particularly hard hit.
  • Hotter summers cause heat stress even to warm-season crops, like tomatoes, according to Cornell University.

MORE TO COME?
The life cycles of insects, including the beneficial ones that keep others in check, may become out of synch with their prey. Pollinators, like the disappearing honeybees, may already be out of synch with the plants they feed on. Science Magazine reported in 2001 that earlier flowering and fruiting has caused such a disconnect for some long-distance migrating birds, who depend on food availability at the same time each year. And to make everything worse, most climate modelers predict more flooding and drought. Even English Gardens are Adapting

To see how gardeners might adapt to all this change, let’s look first at what’s happening in England, a nation of gardeners. Last summer their southeast region had such a severe drought that sprinklers were banned. With more and longer droughts predicted, it’s clear that the very hallmarks of English gardening are now threatened - their traditional lawns and flower borders.

Thus the U.K. Environmental Minister is urging everyone to change their water usage, plant choice (look for drought- and heat-tolerance), and garden design - in other words, change everything they’re doing. No more roses and delphiniums. The use of gas-powered garden equipment is discouraged. Rain barrels are recommended, as are carbon-sequestering cover crops, like clover and winter rye. Brits are being given at least one bit of advise that fits their culture: plant roots are darn good at absorbing carbon dioxide, so plant more of them.

CHANGING OUR GARDENING PRACTICES
Here in the U.S. we see the mainstream gardening media beginning to respond, with both Martha Stewart and Better Homes and Gardens advocating less gas mower and blower usage. Gardening authorities across the U.S. are offering these very good suggestions: add organic matter to make your soil hold moisture better, plant shade trees on the south side of your home to reduce air conditioning loads, and do your planting in fall or early spring. Even turfgrasses can be damaged by the freeze-and-thaw events we’re experiencing, especially where there’s standing water, so we’re being told to fix our drainage problems.

CHOOSING DIFFERENT PLANTS
Research has really just begun, but here are the kinds of plants being recommended by gardening experts in response to global climate change:

Perennials from Mediterranean climates, which thrive without summer rain. Examples are such beautiful and useful plants as lavender, rosemary, sage, catmint, oregano, and thyme. The herb agastache flowers nonstop through the summer and is beloved by bees, and red agastache is a magnet for hummingbirds. Locally native plants are particularly good for sustaining wildlife, but be sure to ask for ones that will survive the new climatic conditions.

Choose trees and shrubs that do well across many temperature zones. Some have seeds that can shift strategies quickly, rather than the generations it usually takes for most trees to adapt to new conditions, which makes them so vulnerable to climate change. Oakleaf hydrangea, serviceberries, deciduous magnolias and many pines are especially adaptable to a range of conditions. Again, the science is evolving, with experts at Cornell currently saying they haven’t yet seen changes that cause long-term damage to trees and shrubs.

HOW GARDENERS CAN HELP REDUCE CLIMATE CHANGE
To borrow from one of the central tenets of organic gardening, the first goal of gardening should be to do no harm. Here are some ways:

  • Stop using gas-powered lawn equipment or products that use fossil fuels in their production, like synthetic fertilizers. Gas mowers spew as much pollution in one hour as a new car does in 40 hours - that’s how terrible the gas-mower technology is. And those synthetic fertilizers can be replaced primarily by compost and organic mulches, supplemented with organic, slow-release fertilizers when an extra boost is needed.
  • Instead of blowing leaves into plastic bags for them to be trucked away to landfills or to an incinerator, turn them into soil, by composting. Home compost operations help lighten pressure on landfills and result in more water-retentive soil for the gardener - that really cool circle of life thing. Some municipalities collect leaves and turn them into free leafmold mulch or compost.
  • Grow your own food. It’s fresh, it’s as organic as you want it to be, and it doesn't have to be trucked or flown in from far away. In the alternative, frequent our local farmer’s markets.
  • Finally, the quaint suggestion that we bring back a garden ornament from our grandmothers’ gardens - the clothes line - comes from the Goracle himself.

ZONE MAPS - A HOT ISSUE
The last time the U.S. Department of Agriculture amended its famous map of zones (bands of land that share the same winter low temperature), was 1990 and a promised update has been delayed. One wonders why. Is it because, as a spokesperson said recently on EarthBeat Radio, the mappers are in Iraq with their tours extended indefinitely? Many suspect another reason - that the Bush administration is trying to avoid documenting more proof of global warming. It didn’t help that the USDA rejected the map update done for them by the American Horticulture Society, and their explanations have been less than convincing. >Fortunately, someone stepped in to fill the void. The National Arbor Day Foundation recently released its own updated map, which shows many places a full zone warmer than in1990, which means their low temperatures are now 10 degrees warmer.

MORE GOOD INFORMATION ON LINE
Both Cornell and the Brooklyn Botanical Garden are excellent sources.  And here's an overview of global warming, carbon credits and the positive contribution made by organic gardening.

Posted by Susan Harris

Could Moscow Teach Us a Thing or Two?

The annual convention of the American Public Garden Association was held in D.C. this year for the firstMoscow_2 time ever - for some reason I can't imagine - and I dropped in to see what was happening.  Passing on the sessions about fund-raising, recruiting volunteers, and innovations in signage, I popped in on the talk about "An International Perspective" to see what's up with that. Turns out it was about the state of botanical gardens in the former Soviet Union, the very existence of which had never crossed my mind. (Well, they hadn't exactly graced the glossy pages of Garden Design Magazine, now had they?)  I was intrigued.

Moscow20bot20grdn201807Speakers showed us gardens from all over the former USSR but from our perspective here in D.C., let's look at Russia's capital city and its Apothecary Garden. (It has no webite, but I found that reference to it on the web.) It was founded in 1706 by Peter the Great for the purpose of teaching doctors and growing medicinal plants, and some of the trees planted by Peter the Great are still standing.  Despite its location at the center of a large, polluted city, the director will have you know it's the most biodiverse spot in Russia.

In 1805 it became the Moscow State University Botanic Garden and since the fall of the Soviet Union, change is everywhere.  They're hell bent on modernizing, becoming sustainable and more relevant.  They "still do lawns and intensive horticultural things," but now have "areas of indecision", which are managed differently.  Differently, but their management actually requires more hort knowledge than the traditional gardens did.  They're using more drought-tolerant plants, paying more attention to soils.  Boardwalks have been constructed to prevent disruption and compaction of soils.  Trees that have fallen victim to Dutch elm disease have been recycled as pavers, very good-looking ones.  These natural-looking areas were described as having "alternative beauty," rather than "exciting plants".  The lake is kept "wild-looking" and cityfolk seem to appreciate it.  Labels and instructional signs are everywhere, and new programs are in the works to make the garden-visiting experience more active. We saw a slide of moms pushing baby carriages in the snow through the gardens and were informed that Russians consider it healthy for children to be outdoors, even in the dead of winter.  Funny, Americans are just now noticing how far away from that basic truth we've strayed and thinking about the consequences of having no connection with nature.

Tradition hasn't been sacked altogether, however.  They still have their spring flower festivals and ornamental displays, and mixed borders of perennials are still grown.  But the people now in charge of this historic garden see their mission as making the public environmentally literate and giving city-dwellers an opportunity to go back to nature.  They urge Russians to use alternatives to gas-powered garden equipment. They sponsor a competition for apartment-dwellers who've landscaped around their buildings.  They partner with the Young Environmentalist Club to create "ecological trails."  And get this: there's actually a "Department for Sustainable Use of Nature and Environmental Protection" in Moscow City.  All of which brings on this min-rant:  Why aren't these things going on in our own capital city?  Just asking.

Here's a PDF about environmental programs at Moscow's Apothecary Garden and  here's a short piece about the Importance of Botanical Gardens.

Posted by Susan Harris

Urban Ecology in the News

New York Times nature writer and blogger Richard Conniff today posted some awfully compelling evidence about the benefits of GREEN in cities (and it's too bad it's behind the Times Select firewall, or we'd link to it).  Some findings:Boston_2

  • Housing projects with trees have about 7 percent less crime than their treeless counterparts, and domestic violence also drops.
  • In a study of kids with Attention Deficit Disorder, spending time in parks proved to be as good as, or better than, pharmaceuticals in helping them concentrate on their work, at least in the short term (so far).
  • It's been shown that open-heart patients in rooms with nature scenes on the wall have lower blood pressure and smoother recoveries than patients with blank walls or abstract art.  And patients in rooms with lots of natural daylight experience less pain.

PhillySo there's plenty of evidence that humans are still creatures of nature, having evolved with trees, open spaces, sunlight, flowers, and foliage around us, though you'd never know it from the way our cities have developed in this country.  But the writer sees change afoot, citing a new Bank of America office building in Manhattan that leans toward and is very open to a park across the street; they even have plans to test the "popular, but unproven, hypothesis that 'green' design can make workers healthier, happier, more productive, and less inclined to absenteeism."  Can't wait for those research results!

The column goes on to mention Baltimore's Parks & People Foundation, Tree People in Los Angeles and  D.C.'s own Casey Trees, and provides this link to the Urban Ecology Institute in Boston.  So let's see what they're up to in Boston.  According to their site, they're all about taking the tree canopy seriously, converting brownfields into wetlands and parks, and lots more community- and school-based green projects.  Check out their Natural Cities Manual or their blog, called Urban Ecology, where the sidebar contains links to more urban ecology progams, like Boston Natural, Parks and People in Baltimore, and Philadelphia Green.

All very exciting, inspiring stuff.  But let's give a poke to the good folks in Boston to link to DC's great groups, like the aforementioned Casey Trees but also Washington Parks and People and all the other great groups on our website.

Take a gander at these links to find out what's happening in these other East Coast cities.  See anything we could do here?  Anything we should do here?  Lots of food for thought.

Posted by Susan Harris

[Top photos from Boston Natural's website; bottom, from Philadelphia Green's website.]