Toronto Destroys 150-Species Natural Garden
In normally eco-conscious Toronto, somebody's got some 'splaining to do. Here's the shocking story.
Thanks to Ann Leger for the tip.
|
We Are: Convinced that gardening MATTERS. Bored with perfect magazine
gardens. In love with real, rambling,
chaotic, dirty, bug-ridden gardens. Suspicious of the “horticultural
industry.” Delighted by people with a passion for plants. Appalled by chemical warfare in the garden. Turned off by any activities
that involve “landscaping” with “plant materials.” Flabbergasted at the idea of a “no
maintenance garden.” Gardening our asses off. Having a hell of a lot of fun. |
« Look, ma, I’m still gardening! | Main | Guerilla Gardening Gets Its Own Wikipedia Entry »
In normally eco-conscious Toronto, somebody's got some 'splaining to do. Here's the shocking story.
Thanks to Ann Leger for the tip.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/854423/21193051
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Toronto Destroys 150-Species Natural Garden:
Amy Stewart: Flower Confidential: The Good, the Bad, and the Beautiful
Amy Stewart: From the Ground Up: The Story of A First Garden
Amy Stewart: The Earth Moved: On the Remarkable Achievements of Earthworms
Ken Druse: Planthropology: The Myths, Mysteries, and Miracles of My Garden Favorites
Rick Darke: The Encyclopedia of Grasses for Livable Landscapes
Joe Lamp'l: The Green Gardener's Guide: Simple, Significant Actions to Protect & Preserve Our Planet
Pamela C. Ronald: Tomorrow's Table: Organic Farming, Genetics, and the Future of Food
Jeff Gillman: The Truth about Garden Remedies: What Works, What Doesn't and Why
Jeff Lowenfels: Teaming with Microbes: A Gardener's Guide to the Soil Food Web
Betsy Clebsch: The New Book of Salvias: Sages for Every Garden
I found some of the comments on that story just as interesting---and pathetic---as the city's mowing/vandalism. A number of commenters said the garden looked weedy and out of control and implied that the homeowner deserved the loss of her garden.
We've come a long way in recent years, but I wonder what it will take to get die-hard lawn people to be tolerant, if not appreciative, of front-yard gardens.
Posted by: Pam/Digging | August 29, 2007 at 03:14 PM
Oy vey. Thank goodness we live in the country. This whole mountaintop would be considered an eyesore and a health hazard and mowed to the ground like the empty house across the street that gets mowed to about 3/4 of an inch high every week.
Perhaps if I had a little lawnette out front the two ladies who stopped at the top of my drive today to pilfer some of my Ironweed could not have exclaimed "Oh we didn't know", when I busted them for tresspassing and stealing flowers.
Posted by: Christopher C. NC | August 29, 2007 at 05:38 PM
Oh my gosh, I would DIE if someone did that to my garden.
Posted by: Brooke | August 29, 2007 at 09:32 PM
OMG! So, I just couldn't resist sending off an e-mail to the "clean and beautiful city". It was so nice of them to link to it in the article.
Posted by: Yvonne NC | August 30, 2007 at 07:35 AM
I can't read stories like that without risking my blood pressure.
In California, naturalistic gardens are looking a little desperate in most places after with no (or little) water since April (and after a particularly dry winter). I can understand why the uninitiated would feel a little apprehensive in my area this time of year. But I don't know Toronto at all.
Posted by: chuck b. | August 30, 2007 at 07:44 AM
At this time of year, a garden like that in TO would be looking a little ratty, no doubt--their climate is similar to ours and we have had no rain. So I am sure some stuff was brown, wilted, etc.
Nonetheless, shocking and dismaying.
I am sure it was her wonderful neighbors.
Posted by: eliz | August 30, 2007 at 09:05 AM
Oh yeah, THAT after picture is a big improvement...NOT!
Posted by: layanee | August 30, 2007 at 05:11 PM
Let's all write to the city of Toronto--home of Marjorie Harris, the Canadian garden diva version of Martha STewart--and tell them what we think of their 'improvements.'
Once again, I'm so grateful that I live in the sticks on seven acres surrounded by trees, where I can grow what I want where I want. So far, anyway.
Posted by: jodi | August 30, 2007 at 07:23 PM
Even if the garden gets ratty looking, that's usually when stuff has gone to seed for next year, right? That seems like a pretty important step in a natural garden, even if it looks a little rough.
Posted by: Brooke | August 30, 2007 at 11:55 PM
she never got any notice that the city had a problem with her garden, before they came and cut it down?
Posted by: Ed Bruske | August 31, 2007 at 09:44 AM