I was recently "selected" for a free issue of a gardening magazine called Garden Gate and dutifully settled into bed with it this week in order to report on this pub.
The magazine bills itself as advertising-free, so you might think that they'd just let 'er rip and tell the truth about everything. Actually, no. As far as I can tell, the business model depends on your going to their on-line store and buying stuff directly from them.
And the content is so namby-pamby inoffensive, they might just as well have a bunch of blowhard advertising clients of the kind that used to so rattle Darren on Bewitched. Actually, "inoffensive" doesn't quite describe it. Depressing and insulting, comes closer. Apparently, we gardeners have a hard time comprehending even two-syllable words. Or any plants more daring than daylilies and hostas.
Apparently, we also really, really like being sucked up to. My issue of Garden Gate devotes six pages to the favorite plants of the magazine's readers. Guess what the readers like? You'll never guess. Daylilies and hostas. Maybe a good nursery will be able to introduce you to these novelties.
This is democracy at its worst. God, for both information and style, give me a benevolent dictatorship like the Plant Delights catalog any day!
There are certainly better magazines than Garden Gate, but as a general principle, I'd rather settle into bed with a catalog. Why is that?
Clearly, there is a huge passion gap operating here. The good catalogs are put together by people who are insane for plants and know everything about their specialty. The magazines? By editors whose jobs appear to hang on their ability to appeal to a demographic that the Garden Rant community does not fit--uncultured, sheltered, conservative, sentimental, easily spooked.
The interesting thing is, I can't think of any other subject besides gardening where the same is true, where the commercial content so frequently trumps the editorial. I mean, I'd certainly rather read Vogue than the Bloomingdale's catalog any day. I'd rather read Bon Appetit than Williams-Sonoma. I love House & Garden and am bored to tears by Restoration Hardware. I'd rather read the op-ed columnists at the New York Times than the brochures I get from politicians. But I'd far rather read the White Flower Farm catalog than even a supposedly serious magazine like Fine Gardening. More stylish.
Am I alone in this?






I used to read BBC's Gardener's World Magazine when I lived in Seattle. It has great articles, funny writers and interesting plants. Helpful for experienced and serious amateurs. I learned tons from this magazine. Plus, it's great for Pacific NW readers, because of the similarity in climates. I haven't found it yet in the DC area, but you should try this magazine. It will give you faith in garden magazines again
Posted by: naomi | September 28, 2007 at 09:23 AM
Oh, well, the British are much better at this stuff. I wasn't including them.
Posted by: Michele Owens | September 28, 2007 at 09:39 AM
What are the best gardening catalogs?
Posted by: Beth | September 28, 2007 at 09:50 AM
Oh god yes. The Plant Delights catalog and the Old House Gardens catalogs are very well-written with humor and opinion. I love others like Brent and Becky's and Bluestone just to learn about all kinds of new plants.
I get WAY more fun out of any of them than any magazine and that includes the better ones like Garden Design.
I think the catalogs are much more attuned to our obsessions--and our problems. Brent and Becky's for example, is very forthright about bulbs that will be more difficult.
YES! Great post!
Posted by: eliz | September 28, 2007 at 10:05 AM
Oh my goodness! White Flower Farm for the photos. Plant Delights for the laughs and the mind-expanding introduction to new plants. Fedco Seeds also for the laughs, and for a shocking and useful degree of opinionatedness on vegetable and fruit varieties. Brent & Becky's Bulbs for the good photos and lots of editorial opinions, including favorite bulbs and combinations. Good cultural information, too, such as the suggestion that a pot of calla lilies be sunk in a pond.
Those are just my favorites. I'm sure my partners have loads of others. I know Elizabeth orders really interesting annuals from catalogs.
Posted by: Michele Owens | September 28, 2007 at 10:06 AM
I subscribed to Garden Gate and found it as described but for new gardeners who are totally intimidated by latin names and anything more than hosta and daylilies it fills a gap perhaps. Love the White Flower Farm catalog even though product has become run of the mill. I really enjoy The American Gardener magazine which comes with a membership to the American Hort. Society. Informative and not too glitzy and, fellow blogger, Kathy Purdy from Cold Climate Gardening has a nice article on colchicums in it! Oh, and Gardens and Gun, of course! LOL (Actually that magazine,while woefully misnamed, has some very good articles. P.S. I love Darren Stevens!
Posted by: layanee | September 28, 2007 at 10:27 AM
White Flower farm full of cutting edge new horticultural introductions ? huh ?? someone is deprived.
I think not. Not where I come from and they don't offer any of the new cool plants that grow in my climate. Where are the grevilleas, the restios, proteas, cussonias or bromeliads ? - nada.
When I receive WFF catalog I simply file it in the round file with other lame garden catalogs or send it to my sister who is a beginner gardener and needs pretty pictures of plants in order to visualize a simple planting of hosta, tulips or daylilies.
Plant Delights is always a hoot to read and is saved in the bookshelf next to other worthy horticultural publications such as Garden Design , Fine Gardening and Alfresco ( a cutting edge garden design magazine from New Zealand ) , all of which offer more information than just a microcrosm of plants.
There is more to gardening than just plants , especially overpriced commonly found plants .
Posted by: Michelle Derviss | September 28, 2007 at 10:46 AM
Hmmm. Pity us poor Canucks, who have two toronto-centric gardening magazines from which to choose. Oh, they might both occasionally surge out to the rest of the country, but by and large they fixate on what's close to them. and as for catalogues, I don't know if I can have Plant Delights sent here, but I'm going to try. Some American catalogues don't send to Canada because they can't ship here.
Thankfully, I have good gardening blogs to read to keep me up to date, educated, and entertained! Because the magazines, even Horticulture and Fine Gardening, tend to leave a lot to be desired anymore.
Posted by: jodi | September 28, 2007 at 10:56 AM
But Michelle, you are a designer! Of course you don't need White Flower Farm.
But for an amateur like me, those photos of simple combinations--generally with some interesting use of color--have been instructive and inspiring. I don't want to over-emphasize this--I wish they'd print some new ones once in a while. But the quality of those images is certainly higher than the photography in most gardening magazines.
And for, the record, I do not look to them for new introductions. I haven't liked the quality of the plants I've gotten from them.
Posted by: Michele Owens | September 28, 2007 at 11:15 AM
The funny thing about that free garden gate is that they have been sending me the exact same magazine every so often for the last 8 years. It is the same exact magazine. How is this possible? Anyone else with this experience?
Posted by: Frances | September 28, 2007 at 11:31 AM
You're not alone, for sure.
I drool over some of the catalogues when they hit my mailbox...not just White Flower Farm, which also offers terrific photos: but others like Digging Dog and Canyon Creek Nurseries as well as some of the seed catalogues like Seeds of Change.
Posted by: fransorin | September 28, 2007 at 11:40 AM
Frances, how interesting! I just checked my copy of Garden Gate and it has no date on it. I just checked the website and it's not the current issue. Is it possible that they just send out the same "sample" issue over and over? That might explain how weightless the whole thing is. But is this really a way to attract subscribers?
Posted by: Michele Owens | September 28, 2007 at 11:42 AM
I enjoyed your post and the comments; I now have a list of new catalogues to research. I feel like such a novice!
Posted by: Pamela | September 28, 2007 at 12:57 PM
I think Garden Gate just sends out a kind of "sampler" type issue in that mail promotion. I've gotten the same one like three times.
Posted by: Colleen | September 28, 2007 at 01:33 PM
White Flower Farm's catalog doesn't do anything for me. Like Michelle, I put it in the circular file rather than bother with all those temperate-climate woodland plants I can't grow.
However, I enjoy looking at the High Country Gardens catalog, which is full of xeric perennials and grasses. I don't think I've ordered anything from them though. Also, Yucca Do's online catalog is full of great ideas.
Posted by: Pam/Digging | September 28, 2007 at 01:45 PM
Unless it's changed drastically, which is possible, I like Garden Gate. I don't [think I] subscribe to it, but I do have several issues. (My number one favorite periodical is Pacific Horticulture, because the best information is *always* local.)
The Garden Gates I have offer nice, very specific planting suggestions with a superimposed grid patterns so you can actually see how much space to allocate for each plant relative to other plants, and they'll suggest alternatives for different zones.
I think I have one issue that goes through all the various milkweeds and discusses their various virtues and liabilities. Plants never have any liabilities in commercial catalogs. (Which alone disqualifies Michele's thesis in this post.)
Lots of good technical information in Garden Gate too which is nice if your garden library isn't so extensive.
Maybe it's changed.
Posted by: chuck b. | September 28, 2007 at 03:33 PM
20 years ago Whiteflower farm was the first catalogue I ever saw except Michigan Bulbs and Springhill, both of which gave no Latin names, were not reliable, and I never ordered from. (when I was little I would take the Springhill catalogue from the wastebasket and sneak it upstairs and read under the bed. Plant porn for the ignorant). Whiteflower Farmswas grand. it opened the door into all the other plant catalogues because it got me on mailing lists. There were no perrenial plants to be found at local nursuries excpet very very common ones. For someone just getting into perrenial gardening, it is a good read.
Posted by: tibs | September 28, 2007 at 04:42 PM
I love wholesale catalogs. The stakes are higher and the information and quality is generally higher too. Plus the audience for them is knowleable folks with a low bs tolerance.
I've got a Hoffman Nursery ornamental grass catalog on my desk now. It's gorgeous. Don't ask me to name two others. I tend not to remember them because I never order from them. But I'll pass along others as they pass through.
Having been a magazine editor, you have to realize that in the grand scheme of things, the articles are simply stuff to fill the space between the ads. It's a business, and increasingly every move is scrutinized because of the high costs of printing, paper and postage.
The reason you keep getting the same issue of Garden Gare? Someone with a spreadsheet figured out that the costs of printing it and mailing it to you (and everyone else on the list that you happen to be on) would be more than recouped by subscription sales and orders generated by that mailing. Actually, it's a little more complicated than that (cost of acquisition of new customers etc.), but not much.
Posted by: Ellis Hollow | September 28, 2007 at 04:58 PM
Me too. I'm a catalog reader. And the photos are nice to look at. I haven't looked at a garden magazine in years.
My favorite is seed catalogs. I love Sand Hill Preservation Center's and Johnny's Selected Seeds'. White Flower Farm is very nice for perennials. Also bulb catalogs like McClure and Zimmerman. Catalogs have a lot of information.
I suppose we're a smaller market than would-be gardeners. Oh well. Blogs and catalogs...
Posted by: Kathy | September 28, 2007 at 06:58 PM
Me too. I'm a catalog reader. And the photos are nice to look at. I haven't looked at a garden magazine in years.
My favorite is seed catalogs. I love Sand Hill Preservation Center's and Johnny's Selected Seeds'. White Flower Farm is very nice for perennials. Also bulb catalogs like McClure and Zimmerman. Catalogs have a lot of information.
I suppose we're a smaller market than would-be gardeners. Oh well. Blogs and catalogs...
Posted by: Kathy | September 28, 2007 at 06:59 PM
I'm more of a website reader, but if you're talking about printed pieces my two favorites include one of each, a catalog (Plant Delights) and a magazine (Gardens Illustrated.) Yes, GI is a UK publication... yes, I know that Brit pubs were exempted in this whole deal. But still, I PORE over them when they show up in my local bookstore. I have almost purchased enough from the newsstand to justify a subscription. :)
But back to the catalogs vs. magazines issue. Seriously, don't you think that it may have something to do with the fact that catalogs do a much better job of allowing you to dream? They're not showcasing particular plant species or maybe featuring a gorgeous garden that doesn't have the particular magic you're looking for... no, they're showing plants, just plants. And you're a gardener. It's like the difference between showing Picasso someone else's painting and showing him some new brushes and pigments. Obviously the latter is going to be more engaging, no?
Posted by: Kim | September 28, 2007 at 08:25 PM
I love Mother Earth News, they have lots of neat articles on sustainable and organic gardening. And the non-gardening info is interesting too. Also, there is a neat magazine called "Grit", kind of like Mother Earth.
Posted by: Brooke | September 28, 2007 at 10:39 PM
In addition to Plant Delights, which leaves me in tears of laughter, I like Forest Farm's catalogue for its gardening quotes. (It's also good to read on those insomnia nights, especially the Japanese maple listings.) Sometimes I go back and reread the articles in old Heronswood catalogues. For sheer, perverse, fun I enjoy reading bad catalogues, such as the 1s with creative names for plants like "Early Snow Glories" and, yes, "Lavender Mountain Lilies."
Posted by: Mr. McGregor's Daughter | September 29, 2007 at 05:56 AM
No one has mentioned SELECT SEED. It has plants AND seeds and is mainly annuals. I get my white heliotrope from them as well as many interesting nicotiana varieties, some fantastic coleus, and old-fashioned geranium varieties you will not find elsewhere. It's not Plant Delights but it has personality.
Also--COLORBLENDS! I should not like this but they have these wild tulip combinations with names like Stop the Car. they often do not give cultivar info, but by now I can. Pretty well-written. Awesome photography. Pure porn.
Also: THE LILY GARDEN. Those blonde beauties who run this place are to die for and their lilies are available nowhere else. They offer the $50 bulbs I've been drooling over. They are serious about their lilies.
Also: the tropical/weird plant catalog--LOGEES. Tres exotique!!
I love, love, love plant catalogs.
Posted by: eliz | September 29, 2007 at 03:08 PM
As a gardening magazine publisher, I'm going to answer that question with "They aren't." However I see your point and want to add to the list my very favorite catalog, especially for holiday shopping: Lee Valley Tools.
Posted by: Jane | September 30, 2007 at 05:06 AM