My Photo

Raves

Tip Jar

Change is good

Tip Jar
Blog powered by TypePad

Copyright

  • Copyright 2006-2011. All rights reserved. Amy Stewart, Michele Owens, Elizabeth Licata, Susan Harris.

Sidebar Photo by:

« At risk | Main | Garden Centers: Can You Provide This Level of Service? »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451bd5e69e200e54f120a9a8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Front Lawns and the Law:

Comments

"Because you know what happens when plants get over four feet tall. Revolution. Mayhem. Anarchy!"..
Actually its a public safety issue .
HUH ?
yup.
Same as not having a fence higher than 3 feet on a corner lot or in your front yard in most California city municipalities.

The reasoning ( which obviously was thought up before the age of the gigantic SUV ) is that one cannot safely see a child or other obstacle while sitting in a car when a 3 foot fence or hedge or whatever is in the way.

Just another one of those pesky code compliant rules Landscape Architects and those planning front yard gardens must be aware of when working in a city and most suburban properties.

Saftety over the sake of horticulture.

I reviewed the before and after ordinance section and it looks like they reached a workable compromise. See, Bureaucrats do listin. Once in awhile.

i am having trouble imagining that safety issue scenario outlined above.

how is not seeing a child in another person's lawn going to hurt the child?

or are you talking about children running into the street?

i don't see how they are going to hide in that bush, then run across the 5 foot wide sidewalk, then across the median strip then past the on street parking and get to me in a way that is more dangerous without the 4 foot plantings.

someone explain this safety issue!

I think by the time my children were over 4 ft tall they could cross the street pretty safely.
Our local ordinance for plantings in the strip near the street is nothing growing over 4 ft. It is for a clear visual as one turns into traffic. Of course most cars are tall enough to block that vision and around here a couple of parked cars are more likely to hide a small child trying to cross or retrieve something.That is when the rare child is actually outside in front playing.

i think its pretty clear the safety issue is secondary to the primary issue of conformity.

a lot of these ordinances came from attempts for cities/towns to maintain a conformity of appearance similar to subdivisions with strict HOAs and covenants.

appraisers were pretty focused on that issue at the time, and older cities were already declining... so it was an obvious step AT THE TIME. currently completely obsolete.

"i think its pretty clear the safety issue is secondary to the primary issue of conformity."

George hit the nail on the head. In charming, treesy, bungalow-filled East Sacramento, where Ms. Baumann lives, a garden without lawn typically breaks up the expansive visual swath of green lining these streets.

What's lacking, except in yards like Ms. Baumann's, is personality. You get no sense of who lives in these homes. Many of these front yards are crying out for a little personality in the form of flowers or edibles or garden accents.

It's up to pioneers like Ms. Baumann to turn the tide. I remember reading about a man whose front lawn grew "too tall", prompting his neighbors to complain. His response was to go out front and mow his name or initials in the grass, leaving the remaining grass untouched. You gotta love that independent spirit.

If enough people plant front yard gardens, it won't be such a big deal. Neighbors tend to want to do what their neighbors are doing. A neighborhood can be attractive AND diverse. That diversity also makes better habitat for birds and other wild things.

The bottom line, in my opinion, is that your house and yard are private property and you can edge your yard with toilet seat planters and garden gnomes and grow nothing but giant pumpkins in between if that's your compulsion. You'll be known as the crazy toilet/gnome/pumpkin neighbor, but what the heck.

Or, like Ms. Baumann, you just want the right to retire your lawnmower, plant a garden with your kids, and share this beauty and bounty with friends, family and passersby.

Indeed. There was NOTHING about safety mentioned during Jean's travail with inspectors. Instead, after she had cut down everything hanging over the curb, and made paths--these were required--through her plantings, they said:

"It still doesn't look like the other yards."

It is not safety. It is conformity.

OK then, horticulture over safety.

Little kids , who needs them anyways when you have easy care shrubberies .

Out in the country here in Georgia where I live, the county doesn't even give you a chance, no, they just drive down the street with a gigantic sideways bushhog hanging five feet onto your property and butcher everything in their path. Trees, shrubs, flowers, they don't discriminate. And they do the same with weed spray. Nice, huh?

Looks like the gardeners of the world need to email-bomb those backward legislators in Georgia!

You plant in the county's r-o-w, you risk losing your plants. Either to the mower or to the salt.(if in a cold area.) That's what a r-o-w or easement means. You own the ground, but who ever has the easement has the right to go on your property for what ever the easement is for. Access? They can drive on your property and maybe even put in a drive. Water or sewer line? They have the right to come in and dig up your landscaping to do the maintenance and replacement work. This whole thing of planting the curb strip seems self defeating. You stand a good chance of losing all that hardwork and beauty if the politcal subdivision has to do some work in that area. Most of our land has mineral rights belonging to someone else. They can come back in and strip mine to within a certain distance of your house. They have to reclaim the land, but it is not going to be your beautiful landscaping and plants.

Safety of kids shouldn't be any more of an issue in a no-lawn front yard garden than it would be in a typical lawn and foundation shrubs setting.

Regardless of garden height, people driving large, high-off-the-ground vehicles have a difficult time seeing children even if they're right in front of or especially behind the vehicle. Thankfully, many new cars come with backup cameras.

Drivers need to be hyper aware of kids in residential neighborhoods and parents should always keep an eye on their kids when they're playing out front.

More people should put up picket fences. That way, dogs and kids can play out front with less worry. They still need supervision.

I know of two little kids who were killed in or near their driveways by large delivery trucks in separate incidents. You can't take your eyes off them for a second out front. Yep, a fence and a parent can make all the difference.

I'm gonna keep planting right up to the edge of the road anyway, I like it because it's a little, warm microclimate. Luckily, we don't have salt here.

The comments to this entry are closed.

And Now a Word From...

Garden Bloggers Fling

Dig It!

Find Garden Speakers At:

GardenRant Bookstore

Awards

Design

And...

AddThis Feed Button
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

widget