My Photo

Raves

Tip Jar

Change is good

Tip Jar
Blog powered by TypePad

Copyright

  • Copyright 2006-2011. All rights reserved. Amy Stewart, Michele Owens, Elizabeth Licata, Susan Harris.

Sidebar Photo by:

« Escape from Sunnyville | Main | Compromises For Pets »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451bd5e69e200e551c2c4e08833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Moving on to Sunnyvale and the Case of Redwoods v. Solar Panels:

Comments

hmm. I think there's a wider issue than the reduced viability of the panels here. Planting 7 of one of the biggest fastest growing trees on the planet in such a position that they can shade your neighbours house is probably unneighbourly behaviour come what may. It reeks of the leylandii hedging issues that torment suburban britain.

If you can afford to install solar panels then you can afford someone to keep them clean.

If placed appropriately they are damn efficient. That’s why they are being so widely installed here in California.
As with all landscape ( softscape and hardscape ) elements such as trees, shrubs, arbors, swimming pools, solar panels , etcetera , proper site analysis is require to get it right.

Perhaps unbeknownst to those not familiar with growing redwood trees , they can be hedged.

It is not a tree that I would specify for such a horticultural endeavor , but it is done and if you want relative immediate gratification and have the financial means to keep up with the maintenance then it is a viable solution for certain site specific locations.

The couple located in Sunnyvale, which is just 10 minutes south of Redwood City could have their cake and eat it too. It is possible to hedge their trees for their desired privacy yet allow for their neighbors to receive the solar gain that their panels require in order to work to full capacity.

BTW, Sunnyvale is located in the natural growing range and migration pattern for redwood trees.

If my neighbors planted California redwoods on our shared border, a "hedge" that threatened to turn into a hundred-foot wall of greenish-black, I would risk arrest to cut them down.

Trees like that belong in forests, not suburbs.

As someone who gardens on an old lot with large trees, I understand the love/hate relationship. Yes, it's important to plant shade trees but there are many trees unsuitable to this purpose especially when you live on small urban or suburban lots. Redwoods are one of them.

Julie at the Human Flower Project has just posted an interesting analysis of good and bad trees for urban settings.

http://www.humanflowerproject.com/index.php/weblog/street_trees_lets_think_outside_the_wires/

The idea of planting redwoods on a suburban street seems ridiculous. Strategic planting of shade trees is not. It can be so important that SMUD, (I can't remember what that stands for exactly - Sacremento Municipal Utilities dept, maybe) has a program of giving homeowners appropriate shade trees along with siting advice to help save energy during their long hot season.

Solar panels are far more useful in giant arrays than individual homes. (The exception is when they're in remote rural areas that can't easily be served by other power sources.) Some places in California's Central Valley have temperatures over 90 degrees for much of the summer and yards with redwood trees are wonderfully cool in this climate. However, our local power company has installed solar panels in parking lots, which provide shade for the cars and power at the same time.

Solar panels over parking lots - YES!

Trees like that belong in forests, not suburbs.

Where do suburbs belong?

Suburbs belong in the 21st century. They need to become productive, not just a habitat for the helpless and a giant drain on the planet.

The comments to this entry are closed.

And Now a Word From...

Garden Bloggers Fling

Dig It!

Find Garden Speakers At:

GardenRant Bookstore

Awards

Design

And...

AddThis Feed Button
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

widget