Not really. In fact, I know colorblind gardeners—even colorblind painters—who do very well, so I should not use the term lightly. But there are some color issues in my garden, and it is probably too late to do very much about them. I'm clueless about color planning and my garden shows it.
For example, I am unlikely to tear up either the crimson roses or the magenta clematis that coexist rather jarringly in the only bed with full sun. There is no place else for them to go, and both are so established that it seems a shame to disturb them. Had there been planning, a nice blue-purple or white clematis would have been lovely. Maybe the blue clematis with yellow foliage (alpina 'Stolwijk Gold') would have provided an interesting contrast.
But who really plans these things? Maybe a designer presented with a tabula rasa from which to build a garden. Not a gardener who inherits an established garden, changes a lot of it, keeps some of it, decides on pink lilies one year, hates pink lilies two years later, decides on a purple/yellow scheme the next year, but doesn’t want to disturb the established pink lilies—and so on.
Color combinations often just happen to gardeners who love plants for themselves more than for the impact they might make, and often buy on impulse. There are lots of books about color in the garden, but that just adds to the shame. For most of us, it’s too late for books.
For example, I love the sunset colors of coleus and the iridescent purple of strobilanthes. Should they be together, as above? Probably not. Then why are they? I’m not sure, except that I needed plants to fill that container.
And above we have what might pass for a charming unstudied cottage garden scheme, but nonetheless, doesn’t represent one iota of forethought about color.
Do I care? Not really, though I daydream about that cool purple, white and yellow bed that I might have had as I gaze at the yellow and red combinations I do have. What’s your worst color combination? Can you link to it? The biggest clash will win a nice book about how to make colors work in the garden from Timber. Entries close at 9 p.m. EST Wednesday
ADDENDUM: Here are the books I am giving from Timber: Green Flowers (Hoblyn and O'Hara), Plant-Driven Design (Ogden and Springer), and The Book of Blue Flowers (Geneve). Of course, I'll need links to color clashes, or (relenting) good descriptions. See, I'm too accepting; that's why I have these clashes.








I am color blind, and I can assure you my garden is one heinous color faux pas - and I could care less. My wife occasionally comments on the most egregious plantings, but she likes the color.
People should all do what makes them happy even if, like me that can be terrifying to anyone with reasonable color coordination skills. I live in a semi-snooty area (we border on the snoots), and despite my wife’s good breeding and vain attempts to use environment to influence and improve my horticultural behavior, I continue to upset the sensibilities of all.
Typically, the most barbed comments are reserved for my repetitive misuse of both color and scale in my plantings. I tend to love plants that while individually beautiful (or at least unique), they require growing conditions and thus positioning that bears no relationship to the most tasteful arrangements possible with the plants existing in the area.
Posted by: Sisyphus's Gardner | June 23, 2009 at 05:31 AM
I don't know that I have any photos, or even whether I would recognize a wild color clash in my garden. My garden is put together in exactly the ways you describe. I'm always getting plants that I end up placing where I have a spot, regardless of what surrounds it. The best I seem able to do is not have clashers blooming in the same season. Fortunately there is no great number of snoots in our country town. There are always some but I don't think they would deign to visit my garden even during the famous Rose Viewing. My Virtual Rose Viewing is up now for others.
Posted by: commonweeder | June 23, 2009 at 05:39 AM
That is what containers are for. You can plan color schemes with them and leave the beds for serendipity. Nature doesn't color coordinate. Saying that, I have to admit I'm not crazy about gold or yellow anywhere near red.
Posted by: Jan | June 23, 2009 at 05:56 AM
Your house color is, however, scrumptious.
Posted by: susan harris | June 23, 2009 at 06:25 AM
This is so me! The mind-changing, I mean. Except that I am fussy about color. So color is the number one reason I rip plants doing beautifully out of the ground--and give them to the neighbors.
The front, I figured out years ago--a delightfully brash combination of tomato red and magenta. But the back--I'm still puzzling that one out. This year, I had yellow-pink climbing roses hovering above silvery-pink peonies and a mislabeled orange troillus. A disaster on every level.
Posted by: Michele Owens | June 23, 2009 at 06:31 AM
If you just add more color, they'll blend. Add a dark to heighten the contrast, and also a pale to help the clematis pop. And then maybe an elongated green leaf of some sort - get a minimum of five things in there, 'cause even numbers don't work with plants (at least for me).
Posted by: naomi | June 23, 2009 at 06:39 AM
Huh, I *like* the orangy-red brick with the crimson and fuschia. There's enough green and black to balance it out and make a nifty complementary color scheme. Red and green are opposites, and the orange toned and violet toned reds add depth.
It's not at all austere and restrained, but I'm not *good* at austere and restrained. And with a red brick house, it's going to be hard to be austere and restrained anyway. So clearly the right solution is plant more red, pink, fuschia, and "black" flowers. Maybe mix up the foliage some to add more depth to the greens too.
Posted by: torrilin | June 23, 2009 at 06:40 AM
Someone (forgot who) planned a double row of perennials that ran north-south. The side that got morning sun was planted with colors with a blue tone (pinks, magentas, etc.) and the other side with the setting sun got the hot colors. Interesting idea, but I would feel disconcerted with cool colors on one side and hot on the other. So instead, I put the cool colors on the east side of my driveway, and on the west where my vegetable garden is, I put the hot colors, which seem to go well with vegetables (all those red tomatoes).
As far as pet peeves go, I am very annoyed that lovely peach colored daylilies look so horrible with pink and rose colored plants.
Posted by: Marfy | June 23, 2009 at 07:02 AM
My worst color combination last year were baskets of coral pink tuberous begonias hung in the crabapple trees which clashed with the blue pink impatiens in the bed below. Neither color complimented the other to my eye, though sometimes those colors can look great. Ended up moving the baskets and later giving away the tubers. Cool pinks are a favorite for me.
Posted by: Jane | June 23, 2009 at 07:17 AM
I don't know, I kind of think that in the garden, no colors are bad together. Then again, maybe I just haven't yet seen a really bad combo? I haven't been at it long enough to see how well or how poorly I am doing color-wise; at this point I place plants according to their needs (light or shade, mainly)and my needs as far as filling space goes. At this point I consider height and maybe texture more than color, but once everything grows in and gets established, I'll be more fussy about color, too. As an artist (though not one of the colorblind variety), I don't mind leaving things to chance a little bit and maybe making a happy mistake. They're all plants, and they're all lovely. You really can't go too wrong, right?
I'm probably still blissfully ignorant.
OK, how about the purple, orange and black ice pansies I planted 'neath the red and magenta roses? I guess some people would cringe about that.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_fOUL6EnleRs/SghbM3ssq_I/AAAAAAAAAU4/OaX6yi_c6hQ/s1600-h/columbine.JPG
Posted by: Amy Greenan | June 23, 2009 at 08:13 AM
I am congenitally color sensitive and simply can't abide clashing colors. I immediatly yanked out a 'Little Grapette' Daylily when I saw that its blooms clashed with those of a nearby Phlox 'Nicky.' I haven't figured out yet what to do about Phlox 'Laura' and Lobelia 'Monet Moment.' The Phlox is very purple, but blooms well in the shade. The Lobelia is a warm pink, but it is a bloom machine & a plant with stature that pretty much carries the border in July and August. I'm sure it won't win, but this is as bad as it gets in my garden. I just can't stand color clashes. Here's the link: http://mcgregorsdaughter.blogspot.com/2007/08/love-for-lobelia.html.
Posted by: Mr. McGregor's Daughter | June 23, 2009 at 08:32 AM
I am an artist myself. The only garden color faux-pas I have ever seen is a lawn with a few boring round shrubs stuck up against the house because some sad homeowner has better things to do than tend a garden.
Posted by: Michelle | June 23, 2009 at 09:53 AM
Coincidentally last night I posted about some nice dark pink Stachys blooming near some "Orange Push up" colored daylilies, and then threw in a deep rose colored coneflower pic for good measure. I tried to be sensitive to others' eyes and sensibilities by NOT putting them in the same picture. Does that count for clash?
http://maydreamsgardens.blogspot.com/2009/06/random-observations-and-thoughts-while.html
Posted by: Carol, May Dreams Gardens | June 23, 2009 at 10:10 AM
Here in zone 10, the color wheel follows the law of the jungle. Some prized plants, like magenta Salvia chiapensis, have flushes of bloom year-round, for which hummingbirds thank me profusely. So when its bloom in early summer coincides with citrus orange crocosmias, so be it. My garden is tiny, and every plant has to have something to offer 12 months of the year in addition to flowers. A good "doer" is included, regardless of color. Tasteful? No. Exciting? Yes!

(crocosmia, far right, with more magenta, calandrinia this time)
Posted by: Denise | June 23, 2009 at 10:36 AM
Clash ? You mean my red & yellow Kangaroo Paws shouldn't be near my purple clematis ? My irises should be arranged for color combinations, not just planted where there's a blank spot ? Hoo-boy - here I thought green could be my great equalizer ....
Posted by: LauraBee | June 23, 2009 at 10:38 AM
well, no orange crocosmia there, photo apparently cropped in transmission, which looks much more tasteful...
Posted by: Denise | June 23, 2009 at 10:40 AM
My biggest complaint is catalog descriptions that mislead.
Right now I am pondering what to do with Penstemon 'Iron Maiden,' which is a heinous orange-red between a dark blood red Knautia macedonica and a dark pink Weigela. Eccchhh to infinity. All the blues I have around it are either too immature or out of synch to counteract it.
I could live with the color IF bloom occurred LATE IN THE SEASON the way the catalog promised. As in, "hard to find red for the late summer garden".
If I had known that meant "blooms late if you cut off all the flowerbuds in May" rather than "naturally blooms late in the season" I would not have bothered at all.
As it is, the color and the mistiming are annoying me so much the plants might wind up on the compost pile.
Posted by: firefly | June 23, 2009 at 12:29 PM
Being a landscape designer, my favorite design is cottage garden. Could be because my yard ends up with all the left over plants that I can't bear to let go. I am much better at spending other people's money, thank god!
Posted by: Chloe | June 23, 2009 at 01:05 PM
Wait -- you're supposed to plan gardens by color?
Huh.
Posted by: donna | June 23, 2009 at 01:38 PM
All colors harmonize in nature.
God or Darwin did not invent the color wheel.
The TROLL
Posted by: greg draiss | June 23, 2009 at 02:57 PM
Could it be time for some Oudolfian advice? Our friend Piet suggests that if a planting scheme follows some basic principles of combining shape and form, colour basically takes care of itself. Mind you, this approach works best when applied with large sweeping brush strokes - mass planting - than it does when everything is combined cheek and jowl. Have a look at the man's website www.oudolf.com/piet-oudolf to see what I mean. Simply brilliant!
Posted by: Justin Russell | June 23, 2009 at 03:10 PM
I have very unfortunate color combos coming up right now, as some deep red and and orange blood lillies are mixing in with some volunteer pink/white coral nymph salvia. I'm trying to link a photo that doesn't do the clash justice.
http://i170.photobucket.com/albums/u271/skipper1968/yard/IMG_0829.jpg
Posted by: Todd | June 23, 2009 at 05:24 PM
Nothing is clashing at the moment to my eyes, perhaps because as soon as I see something clash, I move one of the offending parties. But I suspect there will be trouble later in the summer when the pink oriental lilies are blooming (very late this year) next to the pale yellow 'sunrise' coneflowers that I planted last fall.
Posted by: Marte | June 23, 2009 at 05:45 PM
I prefer to say "contrast" instead of "clash". As in, "The chartreuse sweet-potato vine contrasts BEAUTIFULLY with the bronze-leaf red begonias in my containers." Indeed!!
Posted by: Sharon | June 23, 2009 at 06:20 PM
No such thing as a bad color combination. Unusual, maybe. It all depends on what you're trying to do, from monochrome to confetti.
That said, here's one that's a little on the unusual side.
It's from a web feature I developed many years ago on how to use color in the garden. It was a good exercise, because when I was done I felt like I really understood some color theory as it applied to gardens -- even if I didn't practice it very much. It's here: http://www.hort.cornell.edu/gardening/homegardening/scenee40a.html
If I recall correctly, one of Piet Oudolf's principles is to use large sweeps of plants and use plants that have a large plant-to-flower ratio -- both of which make it more difficult to make unfortunate color combinations.
Posted by: Craig @ Ellis Hollow | June 23, 2009 at 06:35 PM