My Photo

Raves

Tip Jar

Change is good

Tip Jar
Blog powered by TypePad

Copyright

  • Copyright 2006-2011. All rights reserved. Amy Stewart, Michele Owens, Elizabeth Licata, Susan Harris.

Sidebar Photo by:

« In Defense of TV Gardening Clothes | Main | The Case for Funding Extension Services »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451bd5e69e201310ffe9907970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Natives are Easier. Yeah, right!:

Comments

Always great speakers; outgoing, informed, intelligent attendees; good vendors; a good value. The most low pressure fun you can have in two days.

Fiannly someone else with common sense here. All the talk that native plants are a must in the landscape. These purists make one think that all the native plants are gone from the wild!
The TROLL

Angela, good post. I'm not a native plant purist and advise people that if they have a non-native plant that is working well in their landscapes, it is most sustainable to keep it as long as it's not invasive. The reason native plants are highly recommended here in Florida is that they have adapted to little or no freezing weather and our wet and dry seasons. Plants from the Mid-Atlantic region, say, with its winters and even precipitation, often have a hard time surviving here. That being said, much of Florida no longer resembles the 1600s Florida when those native plants ruled. So homeowners need to work on restoring their soil/plant ecosystem where those natives will once again thrive and provide food and shelter for the butterflies and other bugs, which feed the birds, bats, and other bug predators. Once the ecosystem is working, native plants do indeed require much less care than imports that are expecting a different environment.

With over wintering monarchs devastated by 50% or more (as in dead), I wholeheartedly say teach native in teh way Tallamy suggests--and his book changed my life. But if we can finda way to kill grasshoppers.... Some day we'll all wake up and wonder, like I wonder where my car keys are right now, why we no longer see monarchs or orioles.

Good post Angela - as for vertically challenged speakers - there's only one "favorite" - the diva herself - Stephanie C.

Astroturf needs no care. ;)

I am feeling a surge of respect for my local native plant society. I do think natives require less care (once established, and in the right spot) than many non-natives. However, the main talking point our native plant society sells is that they replenish habitat (and food) for wildlife. Plus they're darned pretty.

That said, I'll still grow my organic roses and annual veggies, too.

Troll,I'm not hearing anything but about natives in the rant. I'm no horticulturalist nor visit many conferences or hear really anyone pushing the drug we call native plants(except in blogtown). Yet I do have some sense, and am intelligent enough to know that a garden is work and play. That said, I essentially never water my garden with its native asters, milkweed, coneflower, phlox, ferns, solidago, eupatorium, etc. and roses, sedums, yarrows, lavender, sages, bulbs, etc etc. Natives or not, a garden is an environment. Choose well. And I accept my bugs. Gardeners get it. Homeowners with yards to fill perfectly, that's something else and sales pitches are snake oil by definition. I like Bill Cullina and it does sound like a good conference.

Great rant Angela. I think the reason native pushers focus on the "less work" angle is that is a much easier and more appealing argument than Doug Tallamy's. I have to say, until I read his book I never focused on the need to feed bugs if we want butterflies, birds, etc. Too many people - and I used to be one of them - think of most bugs as "the enemy."

I signed up for the conference last week and am really looking forward to it!

Great intro to native plants. One caution I think is of importance (other than no garden is maintenance free which you stated so well) is that even natives can be invasive. For example, milkweed does bring the monarchs but letting the flowers go to seed and spread without control leads to an attempted milkweed coup in taking over the garden.

Desiring a plant that blooms continuously, requires no care and behaves perfectly is a fine ideal - but it's NOT GARDENING! Over time I have become one of those more direct people that butts in and bluntly informs the person asking for such a plant just how lovely some of the newer plastic flowers and astroturf are. I don't waste my time explaining it beyond that.

Well, quite a rant there! Now, on the one hand, I really agree. It's sad to see people stick a few natives in the ground, ignore them for 3-6 months, and complain that they die. Insects will nibble at natives, though for me, having a low water garden really cuts down on slugs. Natives need care, and need the right condition to thrive.

On the other hand, I do believe that California natives and Mediterranean plants need much less water than most ornamentals. I spend less time working in my native garden than people with lawns. And who are those mythical native plant pushers anyway?

BTW, I LOVE the Tallamy book and recommend it to everyone, but his plant list is sadly lacking for those on the west coast. If you live in California, go to www.cnps.org, or have a look at my article on finding appropriate plants for where you live here http://tmousecmouse.blogspot.com/2009/11/where-are-you-planted.html

Have fun at the conference!

Thank you for promoting Tallamy's book!

"Why aren’t the native plant pushers teaching this? "

Well, I am a native plant pusher, and I *am* teaching this. I just wrote the first of a series of articles for my local newspaper on the benefits of native plants, and I did not harp on how much easier they are to grow. I used the article to promote Tallamy's book and local sources of native plants.

Minor point, but I think you got your non-native pests mixed up. Emerald Ash Borer is what is eliminating ash trees here in the Mid-West.
Asian Longhorn Beetle is a newer, emerging plague -- mostly a problem in the NY area right now, I believe, but may well be on its way to kill FAR more than just ash trees.

I haven't had the experience that native plants are more maintenance free than non-natives either.

Honestly, it could be a native plant, but what zone in your state should it actually be growing in? Something else to consider.

Thanks for this rant. Speaking as someone who has killed a number of native plants now, I think it's time we started a Truther movement about natives. People should plant some natives, by all means, but a little reality check is a good thing.

Ray, By definition a plant native to an area is not invasive. Agressive maybe, but not invasive.

Town Mouse, one example of over-marketing of native plants from "pushers" is this info about organic gardening from the NWF:

"Plant native plants which can hold their own against native pests."

No mention of all the nonnative pests that are the reality of gardening in the 21st century.

Here's the source - which stresses native plants for gardening organically. http://www.nwf.org/Get-Outside/Outdoor-Activities/Garden-for-Wildlife/Gardening-Tips/Organic-Gardening.aspx
Better gardening advice would be to recommend well-adapted plants from wherever. Y'all in arid climates are so right about YOUR native plants (and those from S. Africa and the Mediterranean)- they ARE more drought-tolerant than the average import. Our native East Coast woodland plants? Not so much.

"Ray, By definition a plant native to an area is not invasive. Agressive maybe, but not invasive."

Ginny, you must not be familiar with horsetail in the Pacific Northwest. It IS invasive in the artificial environment of a garden.

Deirdra, an invasive species is one which moves in and takes over an ecosystem to the detriment of other species. Your garden does not constitute an ecosystem.

. . .excure me, I meant to say that your "artificial environment" garden does notnot constitute an ecosystem. Some gardeners do, however, strive to recreate the local, native ecosystem with their gardens.

Argh, I am full of typos today!

Thank you for your wonderful, timely rant! Tomorrow I am going to pick up my order of native trees and shrubs from my local Soil & Water Conservation District--the great prices are what sold me on placing the order--and in my preparation for their planting and care I can see I will be spending just as much time and energy on care for these as on my soon-to-be-planted veggie garden!

I've learned to think in terms of climate rather than native (indigenous, actually) vs. non-native. If you need to use a non-native to create the right climate for your other natives, do so. My garden is a mix of both native/non-native and much happier for it...

My native-pusher pet peeve is all the ones who claim that you should plant them because they are "drought-tolerant" - um, NO, in general, they are not. Most all native plants to my 'hood are bog dwellers and prefer wet feet. I have lots of dry shade and no natural creek running through it. Many natives have come to my garden and croaked or just "evaporated" after one year because I do not irrigate nor baby my plants. Survival of the fittest, honey, in my little garden kingdom. Native or not, it is all about right plant, right place.

I'm happy (and surprised) to see someone say that native plants are not the 100% perfect solution 100% of the time. Very refreshing!

A garden may no longer be a "native" environment. There are space limitations, often the native soil has been removed by the builder, drainage has been altered, the microclimate itself has been affected by concrete driveways, buildings, and so on.

And what about the gardeners who grows their own food? Are they irresponsible for growing "non-native" fruits and vegetables?

The comments to this entry are closed.

And Now a Word From...

Garden Bloggers Fling

Dig It!

Find Garden Speakers At:

GardenRant Bookstore

Awards

Design

And...

AddThis Feed Button
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

widget